Online First

Drought Resilience of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon Populations in Manipur, North-East India

Authors & Affiliations

Vivek Vaishnav Corresponding Author
Laboratory for Conservation & Genetic Improvement of Forest Trees (Lab-CGIFT), Department of Forestry, School of Agricultural Sciences, Manipur University, Imphal-795 003, India
Z. Philamazan Peace Shimray
Laboratory for Conservation & Genetic Improvement of Forest Trees (Lab-CGIFT), Department of Forestry, School of Agricultural Sciences, Manipur University, Imphal-795 003, India
Hira Soraisam
Laboratory for Conservation & Genetic Improvement of Forest Trees (Lab-CGIFT), Department of Forestry, School of Agricultural Sciences, Manipur University, Imphal-795 003, India

Article Dates

RECEIVED October 09, 2026
REVISED April 05, 2026
ACCEPTED April 07, 2026
AVAILABLE ONLINE June 08, 2026

Abstract

This study evaluated water-use efficiency (WUE) and drought-stress-related traits in two P. kesiya populations, the Eastern (Andro) and Western (Langol), from the valley region of Manipur. The populations were sampled from sites with bioclimatic and edaphic conditions that were significantly similar yet reproductively isolated. Five trees per population were sampled for needle and wood cores for measuring wood moisture content (WMC), stomatal number per length (SNL), relative water content (RWC), and proline concentration, along with growth traits viz. height, girth at breast height. Significant differences were observed in SNL, WMC, and proline content, but not in RWC. Andro showed higher SNL (67) than Langol (57.11), suggesting greater stomatal conductance and potentially lower WUE under drought conditions. Langol's slightly lower SNL and higher proline (0.19 mM, albeit Andro's 0.14 mM) indicate a water conservation strategy and stronger biochemical defenses against drought stress. Andro's higher WMC (46.18) than Langol's 33.10 supports hydraulic resilience. Both populations maintained high RWC, indicating effective leaf hydration. These findings highlight P. kesiya's physiological plasticity, with Langol adapted to drier conditions and Andro suited to wetter environments, informing afforestation and forest management strategies in North-East India amid escalating climate change impacts.

Keywords

Pinus kesiya Water-use efficiency Drought tolerance Climate change Forest resilience

Reference List

Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., & Cobb, N. (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest ecology and management, 259(4), 660-684.
Anderegg, W. R., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F., Choat, B., & Jansen, S. (2016). Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(18), 5024-5029.
Aragão, L. E. O. C., Anderson, L. O., Fonseca, M. G., Rosan, T. M., Vedovato, L. B., Wagner, F. H., Silva, C. V. J., Silva Junior, C. H. L., Arai, E., Aguiar, A. P., Barlow, J., Berenguer, E., Deeter, M. N., Domingues, L. G., Gatti, L., Gloor, M., Malhi, Y., Marengo, J. A., Miller, J. B., ... Saatchi, S. (2018). 21st century drought-related fires counteract the decline of Amazon deforestation carbon emissions. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02771-y
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. A., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39(1), 205-207.
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019). Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in plant science, 10, 225.
Blackman, C. J., Billon, L. M., Cartailler, J., Torres-Ruiz, J. M., & Cochard, H. (2023). Key hydraulic traits control the dynamics of plant dehydration in four contrasting tree species during drought. Tree Physiology, 43(10), 1772-1783.
Bramley, H., Turner, N. C., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2013). Water use efficiency. In Genomics and breeding for climate-resilient crops (Vol. 2, pp. 225–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37048-9_6
Carillo, P., & Gibon, Y. (2011). Protocol: extraction and determination of proline. PrometheusWiki, 2011, 1-5.
Chaturvedi, R. K., Gopalakrishnan, R., Jayaraman, M., Bala, G., Joshi, N. V., Sukumar, R., & Ravindranath, N. H. (2011). Impact of climate change on Indian forests: a dynamic vegetation modeling approach. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 16(2), 119-142.
Choat, B., Brodribb, T. J., Brodersen, C. R., Duursma, R. A., López, R., & Medlyn, B. E. (2018). Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 558(7711), 531-539.
Corcuera, L., Gil-Pelegrín, E., & Notivol, E. (2012). Differences in hydraulic architecture between mesic and xeric Pinus pinaster populations at the seedling stage. Tree Physiology, 32(12), 1442-1457.
Delauney, A.J. & Verma, D.P.S. (1993), Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. The Plant Journal, 4, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x
Dien, D. C., Mochizuki, T., & Yamakawa, T. (2019). Effect of various drought stresses and subsequent recovery on proline, total soluble sugar and starch metabolisms in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Production Science, 22(4), 530-545.
Duan, H., Shao, C., Zhao, N., Wang, D., Resco de Dios, V., & Tissue, D. T. (2024). The role of leaf superoxide dismutase and proline on intra-specific photosynthesis recovery of Schima superba following drought. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 8824.
Fan ZX, et al. (2019). Growth responses of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis to climate variability in the Ailao Mountains, Southwest China. Dendrochronologia, 53:39-46.
Frank, D. C., Poulter, B., Saurer, M., Esper, J., Huntingford, C., Helle, G., ... & Weigl, M. (2015). Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 579-583.
Fu, Y., Ma, H., Chen, S., Gu, T., & Gong, J. (2017). Control of proline accumulation under drought via a novel pathway comprising the histone methylase CAU1 and the transcription factor ANAC055. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, 579 - 588.
Gogoi, B., & Lahon, D. (2022). Impact of climate change on Biodiversity of Northeast India: An overview. Indian. J Appl Pure Bio, 37(2), 322-331.
Haghpanah, M., Hashemipetroudi, S., Arzani, A., & Araniti, F. (2024). Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological and Molecular Responses. Plants, 13(21), 2962. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212962
Hammer, Ø., David, A.T., & Paul, D. R. (2001). Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4 (1). http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
Hepworth, C., Turner, C., Landim, M. G., Cameron, D., & Gray, J. E. (2016). Balancing water uptake and loss through the coordinated regulation of stomatal and root development. PloS one, 11(6), e0156930.
Hijmans, R. J. , Cameron, S. E. , Parra, J. L. , Jones, P. G. , & Jarvis, A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 25(15), 1965–1978. 10.1002/joc.1276
Holbrook, N. M. (1995). Stem water storage. In Plant stems (pp. 151-174). Academic Press.
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 3056 pp., doi:10.1017/9781009325844.
Keyvan, S. (2010). The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 8(3), 1051-1060
Khoma, Y. A., Nesterenko, O. G., Kutsokon, N. K., Khudolieieva, L. V., Shevchenko, V. V., & Rashydov, N. M. (2021). Proline content in the leaves of poplar and willow under water deficit. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 12(3), 519-522.
Kijowska-Oberc, J., Dylewski, Ł., & Ratajczak, E. (2023). Proline concentrations in seedlings of woody plants change with drought stress duration and are mediated by seed characteristics: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15157.
Kouwenberg, L. L., McElwain, J. C., Kürschner, W. M., Wagner, F., Beerling, D. J., Mayle, F. E., & Visscher, H. (2003). Stomatal frequency adjustment of four conifer species to historical changes in atmospheric CO2. American Journal of Botany, 90(4), 610-619.
Li, Z. K., Li, H. L., Gong, X. W., Wang, H. F., & Hao, G. Y. (2024). Prediction and mapping of leaf water content in Populus alba var. pyramidalis using hyperspectral imagery. Plant Methods, 20(1), 184.
McDowell, N., Pockman, W. T., Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., & Yepez, E. A. (2008). Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?. New phytologist, 178(4), 719-739.
Meena, Y.K., Kaur, N. (2019). Towards an understanding of physiological and biochemical mechanisms of drought tolerance in plant. Annual Research & Review in Biology.
Miyazawa, S. I., Livingston, N. J., & Turpin, D. H. (2006). Stomatal development in new leaves is related to the stomatal conductance of mature leaves in poplar (Populus trichocarpa× P. deltoides). Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(2), 373-380.
Moran, E., Lauder, J., Musser, C., Stathos, A., & Shu, M. (2017). The genetics of drought tolerance in conifers. New Phytologist, 216(4), 1034-1048.
Murthy, I.K., Tiwari, R., & Ravindranath, N. H. (2011). Climate change and forests in India: adaptation opportunities and challenges. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 16(2), 161-175.
National Working Plan Code (2023). MoEFCC, New Delhi, India
Newton, R. J., Sen, S., & Puryear, J. D. (1986). Free proline changes in Pinus taeda L. callus in response to drought stress. Tree Physiology, 1(3), 325-332.
Olano, J.M., Linares, J.C., García‐Cervigón, A.I., Arzac, A., Delgado, A.D., & Rozas, V. (2014). Drought-induced increase in water-use efficiency reduces secondary tree growth and tracheid wall thickness in a Mediterranean conifer. Oecologia, 176, 273-283.
Patricio, J. H. P., & Tulod, A. M. (2010). Carbon sequestration potential of Benguet pine (Pinus kesiya) plantations in Bukidnon, Philippines. Journal of Nature Studies, 9(1), 99-104.
Petek, A., Petrík, P., Lamarque, L. J., Cochard, H., Burlett, R., & Delzon, S. (2023). Drought survival in conifer species is related to the time required to cross the stomatal safety margin. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74(21), 6847-6859.
Pirasteh‐Anosheh, H., Saed‐Moucheshi, A., Pakniyat, H., & Pessarakli, M. (2016). Stomatal responses to drought stress. Water stress and crop plants: A sustainable approach, 1, 24-40.
Poury, N., Seifi, E., & Alizadeh, M. (2023). Effects of salinity and proline on growth and physiological characteristics of three olive cultivars. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(4), 1169-1180.
Pumijumnong, N., & Wanyaphet, T. (2006). Seasonal cambial activity and tree-ring formation of Pinus merkusii and Pinus kesiya in Northern Thailand in dependence on climate. Forest ecology and management, 226(1-3), 279-289.
Roy, A., Kolady, D., Paudel, B., Yumnam, A., Mridha, N., Chakraborty, D., & Singh, N. U. (2021). Recent trends and impacts of climate change in North-Eastern region of India-A review. Journal of Environmental Biology, 42(6), 1415-1424.
Sapes, G., & Sala, A. (2021). Relative water content consistently predicts drought mortality risk in seedling populations with different morphology, physiology and times to death. Plant, cell & environment, 44(10), 3322-3335.
Shabnam, N., Tripathi, I., Sharmila, P., & Pardha-Saradhi, P. (2016). A rapid, ideal, and eco-friendlier protocol for quantifying proline. Protoplasma, 253(6), 1577-1582.
Singh, H., & Kumar, M. (2022). Climate change and its impact on Indian Himalayan forests: current status and research needs. In Climate change: impacts, responses and sustainability in the Indian Himalaya (pp. 223-242). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in plant science, 15(2), 89-97.
Vaishnav, V., Kumar, P., Shirke, P. A., & Rana, T. S. (2021). Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination-based water use efficiency of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) and its association with growth and wood quality traits. Trees, 35(3), 799-807.
Wang, X., Fan, Y., Yan, M., Tao, Z., He, D., Du, G., ... & Si, B. (2024). Direct characterization of deep soil water depletion reveals hydraulic adjustment of apple trees to edaphic changes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 348, 109932.
Ziemińska, K., Rosa, E., Gleason, S. M., & Holbrook, N. M. (2020). Wood day capacitance is related to water content, wood density, and anatomy across 30 temperate tree species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 43(12), 3048-3067.

Cite As

Vaishnav, V., Shimray, Z. P. P., & Soraisam, H. (2026). Drought resilience of pinus kesiya royle ex gordon populations in manipur, North-East india. Indian Journal of Ecology, 53(2), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJECOL/2026/4786

Download Full Article

Access the complete research article in PDF format

Download PDF
123 downloads