Functional Diversity of Bacterial and Fungal Endophytes Associated with Mulberry (Morus spp.) Cultivated in Southern Karnataka, India

Manuscript ID: IJECOL-26-0021
Section: Online First
Article Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55362/IJECOL/2026/0021
Citations: Crossref

Authors & Affiliations

NITISH KUMAR L S Corresponding Author
University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
ORCID: 0009-0008-4088-4249
Email: nitishkumarls1241@gmail.com
G. SUGEETHA
University of Agricultural Sciences, Mandya
ORCID: 0000-0003-0379-2149
ASHA N. N.
University of Agricultural Sciences, Mandya
ORCID: 0000-0002-6024-1928

Article Dates

RECEIVED February 17, 2026
REVISED June 30, 2026
ACCEPTED July 01, 2026
AVAILABLE ONLINE July 18, 2026

Abstract

Mulberry (Morus spp.) cultivation is frequently constrained by both abiotic and biotic stresses, including insect pests and diseases, which adversely affect silkworm health and silk productivity. Endophytes, defined as microorganisms that colonize internal plant tissues without causing visible harm, represent a promising but underexplored biological resource for enhancing plant vigour, stress tolerance and nutritional quality. The present study evaluated the diversity of bacterial and fungal endophytes associated with eight mulberry varieties grown under field conditions in southern Karnataka, India, and assessed their potential implications for mulberry growth and silkworm biology. Endophytic microorganisms were isolated from surface-sterilized leaf and shoot tissues using standard culture-dependent techniques. A total of four dominant endophytic genera were consistently recovered across samples, including Bacillus spp. among bacteria and Aspergillus spp., Trichoderma spp. and Fusarium spp. among fungi. The frequency and distribution of these endophytes varied among mulberry varieties and between plant tissues, indicating clear host genotype- and tissue-specific colonization patterns. In general, shoots harboured comparatively higher fungal diversity, while bacterial endophytes, particularly Bacillus spp., were more consistently distributed across both tissues. Although quantitative data on isolation frequency and abundance are presented in the results section, the observed patterns indicate differential colonization efficiency among mulberry genotypes. The dominance of Bacillus and Trichoderma suggests potential plant growth-promoting functions, including improved nutrient availability, enhanced physiological activity and increased stress tolerance of host plants. These microbial interactions are likely to influence mulberry leaf quality, a critical determinant of silkworm growth performance and cocoon traits.

Keywords

Sericulture, Microbial diversity, Plant growth promotion, Mulberry

Classifications

Planning for sustainable agriculture

Reference List

Barnett, H. L., & Hunter, B. B. (1998). Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi (4th ed.). APS Press.
Bisset, J. (1991). A revision of the genus Trichoderma. I. Section Longibrachiatum sect. nov. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69, 2373–2417.
Cappuccino, J. G., & Sherman, N. (2014). Microbiology: A laboratory manual (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Dandin, S. B., & Giridhar, K. (2014). Handbook of sericulture technologies. Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
Domsch, K. H., Gams, W., & Anderson, T. H. (2007). Compendium of soil fungi (2nd ed.). IHW-Verlag.
Gowda, K. N. N., Rajanna, D., & Ramesh, H. L. (2009). Effect of mulberry leaf quality on economic parameters of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). Indian Journal of Sericulture, 48, 12–17.
Gunasekhar, V., & Somayaji, M. R. (2019). Influence of mulberry leaf quality on growth and cocoon traits of Bombyx mori L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7, 1085–1090.
Gyaneshwar, P., James, E. K., Mathan, N., Reddy, P. M., Reinhold-Hurek, B., & Ladha, J. K. (2001). Endophytic colonization of rice by a diazotrophic strain of Azoarcus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 3328–3337.
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., & van Elsas, J. D. (2015). Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends in Microbiology, 23, 463–471.
Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004). Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 43–56.
Hosamani, V., Raghavendra, S., & Suresh Kumar, N. (2020). Pests and diseases of mulberry and their management. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8, 2555–2561.
Hyde, K. D., & Soytong, K. (2008). The fungal endophyte dilemma. Fungal Diversity, 33, 163–173.
Kavitha, R., Raguchander, T., Samiyappan, R., & Saravanakumar, D. (2011). Endophytic bacteria for plant growth promotion and suppression of bacterial blight of cotton. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 2380–2386.
Krishnaveni, M., Ramesh, H. L., & Rajanna, D. (2014). Effect of Trichoderma spp. on mulberry growth and leaf yield. Journal of Biopesticides, 7, 128–133.
Malfanova, N., Franzil, L., Lugtenberg, B., & Chebotar, V. (2013). Endophytic bacteria with plant growth-promoting properties. Plant and Soil, 362, 1–12.
Miliutė, I., Buzaitė, O., & Stanys, V. (2015). Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops and their role in stress tolerance. Agronomy Research, 13, 468–478.
Murugesh, K. A., Mahalingam, C. A., & Saravanan, D. (2012). Influence of endophytic fungi on mulberry leaf quality and silkworm performance. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 51, 72–78.
Nagaraju, R., & Giridhar, K. (2017). Role of biofertilizers in improving mulberry productivity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87, 153–158.
Nataraja, K. N., Reddy, A. R., & Prasad, T. G. (2011). Endophytes in perennial plants: Diversity and functions. Journal of Plant Biology, 38, 1–12.
Paul, D. C., Subba Rao, G., & Deb, D. C. (2005). Impact of leaf quality on silkworm growth and cocoon characters. Journal of Insect Physiology, 51, 1–7.
Peng, J., Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2023). Host genotype-driven variation in endophytic microbial communities. Plant and Soil, 485, 135–150.
Rao, S. R., & Sivaprasad, V. (2007). Role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in mulberry cultivation. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 46, 92–97.
Ravikumar, G., Mahalingam, C. A., & Rajanikanth, K. (2015). Influence of bacterial endophytes on mulberry leaf quality and silkworm performance. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7, 593–598.
Rekha, P. D., Lai, W. A., Arun, A. B., & Young, C. C. (2014). Effect of free and encapsulated plant growth-promoting bacteria on plant growth. Journal of Microbiology, 52, 93–101.
Rodriguez, R. J., White, J. F., Arnold, A. E., & Redman, R. S. (2009). Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist, 182, 314–330.
Schulz, B., & Boyle, C. (2005). The endophytic continuum. Mycological Research, 109, 661–686.
Singh, L. P., Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2011). Unraveling the role of fungal symbionts in plant stress tolerance. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6(2), 175–191.
Singh, R., Singh, S., & Sharma, S. (2013). Endophytic bacteria: Role in plant growth promotion and biocontrol. Agricultural Reviews, 34(3), 223–233.
Stone, J. K., Bacon, C. W., & White, J. F. (2000). An overview of endophytic microbes. In C. W. Bacon & J. F. White (Eds.), Microbial endophytes (pp. 3–29). Marcel Dekker.
Strobel, G., & Daisy, B. (2003). Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 67(4), 491–502.
Sturz, A. V., Christie, B. R., & Nowak, J. (1999). Bacterial endophytes: Potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18(1), 1–30.
Vanitha, S. (2018). Sustainable mulberry cultivation practices for sericulture. Indian Journal of Ecology, 45(4), 681–687.
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Z. (2010). Influence of mulberry leaf quality on silkworm growth and silk production. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 912–916.

Cite As

Kumar N.L.S., Sugeetha G., & Asha N.N. (2026). Functional diversity of bacterial and fungal endophytes associated with mulberry (Morus spp.) cultivated in southern Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Ecology, Online first publication. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJECOL/2026/0021

Download Full Article

Access the complete article in PDF format

31 downloads

Download PDF